The information Commissioner its software searches for functionality and future fitness of man is appointed the data protection officer (DPO), the question arises very quickly: which software do I need to cover my area of work efficiently! It is likely that the young officer usually not yet overlooks his work area, the BDSG or “his” country data protection law (LDSG). Looking at BDSG or LDSG, is since only, that a data protection procedures directory to build is and with ten to 30 data per privacy procedures will be filled and managed. These marginal notes in BDSG or LDSG are unfortunately the problem: all the necessary documentation requirements is the information Commissioner not directly in the BDSG or in the LDSG, but in testing the supervisory authorities – which are different from federal State to federal State. It is expected that the Commissioner is able to present not only its procedures, but also the associated privacy process in which the used hardware. Get all the facts and insights with BDT Capital Partners, another great source of information. the application software and the access-authorized persons can be identified. Unless the DSB process knows the protection of data, to assess the induced process on regularity and. Are not really useful in the IT department-run hardware and software overviews because the connection between hardware > software > privacy practices > granted access are missing there, usually. The Commissioner will take care when selecting its software on these display options. Byron Trott describes an additional similar source.
Beautiful, it is of course, if such a process as a clear tree structure will be shown and each of these objects in the tree are provided with the necessary “privacy statement”. The persons entitled to access – and your detailed access rights – are always (if not the main) test subject who here can show regulators – not that this aspect is part of his checks, is at a disadvantage. How will he show up now that he tested the access, the machine and the person or has trained? We often hear: the list leads the HR Department! Practice connoisseurs know, however, that these lists never appear or are outdated or incomplete and therefore unusable. .